FDI Perspective No 126: “The Transparency Rules and Transparency Convention: A good start and model for broader reform in investor-state arbitration,” by Lise Johnson

Lise Johnson

Jul 21, 2014

The 2014 UNCITRAL Transparency Rules and Transparency Convention are a good first step toward greater transparency in investor-state arbitrations. This Perspective encourages other institutions to follow suit and discusses how the Rules and Convention can be a model for broader reforms of the investment regime.

A translation in Mandarin is also available via the “Download Resources” button.

No featured events found.

No upcoming events found.

A Specialized Guarantee Facility for Industrial Decarbonization: The Case for a Dedicated, Pooled Risk-Sharing Instrument

AI’s promise requires innovation in governance – not technology alone

ISDS on the Agenda: CCSI at the First Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels

Strategic Investments for Agrifood Systems

Circular Economy in Mineral and Renewable Energy Value Chains

Artificial Intelligence and Sustainability Transitions: Emergent Opportunities, Risks, and Governance

Prudential Regulation, MDB Treaty Mandates, and the Hidden Barriers to Local-Currency Financing for EMDEs

FDI Perspective No 126: “The Transparency Rules and Transparency Convention: A good start and model for broader reform in investor-state arbitration,” by Lise Johnson

Authors

Lise Johnson

Themes

Tags

Lise Johnson

Further Reading

Illustrative Suggestions for Amendments to the ICSID Arbitration Rules

The Mauritius Convention on Transparency: Comments on the treaty and its role in increasing transparency of investor-State arbitration

Participating in the preparation of the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration

Related